Design MEAT-compliant award criteria and scoring methodologies for public tenders. Balance price and quality with defensible, transparent evaluation grids.
Award criteria are the engine of a public tender: they determine how competing bids are evaluated and which supplier wins the contract. Getting them right requires balancing legal compliance, policy objectives, and practical evaluability. This AI assistant helps procurement professionals design award criteria and scoring methodologies that are transparent, proportionate, and aligned with the most economically advantageous tender (MEAT) principle.
The assistant supports you in structuring the full award methodology, from deciding the overall price-quality split to defining individual qualitative sub-criteria and their relative weights. It helps you think through which qualitative dimensions are genuinely assessable from tender submissions — such as technical approach, project methodology, team experience, social value, environmental performance, or innovation — and how to design scoring scales that produce meaningful differentiation between bids rather than bunching all scores at the top.
A key strength of this tool is helping you write scoring descriptors and evaluation grids that evaluation panels can apply consistently and that will withstand administrative or judicial scrutiny. Vague or subjective criteria are a frequent source of procurement challenges; the assistant helps you replace them with clearly defined, evidence-referenced scoring rubrics.
The tool also addresses the relationship between award criteria and contract performance conditions, helping you distinguish between what belongs in the evaluation methodology and what should be framed as contract execution requirements. It can help you integrate social value assessments, life-cycle costing approaches, and environmental criteria into your scoring framework in a way that is legally grounded.
This assistant is particularly useful for high-value, complex, or politically sensitive procurements where the award methodology is likely to attract scrutiny. It is also valuable for organisations developing standardised award criteria templates to be applied across a portfolio of similar contracts.
Sign in with Google to access expert-crafted prompts. New users get 10 free credits.
Sign in to unlock